Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martha Matoula vs Beatrice Stagno Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matoula vs Stagno analysis and find out who is favored!
Martha Matoula vs Beatrice Stagno Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matoula 1 - 0 Stagno
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matoula has won 39.29% of points on their second serve, while Stagno has won 36.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matoula, in recent form, has won 57.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stagno has won 56.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.3% and 37.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matoula has saved 45.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stagno has saved 42.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matoula has won 49.21% of matches played (W/L 31/ 32), with Stagno winning 41.67% (W/L 15/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matoula has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 95/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Stagno has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 18/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Matoula has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.12% of matches (W/L 28/ 29), where as Stagno has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matoula winning 1 times and Stagno being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matoula winning 2 and Stagno winning 0. The last match between Matoula and Stagno was at the W25 Cairo, 07-09-2022, First, Clay with Martha Matoula getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Matoula and Stagno have played a deciding set 0 times, with Matoula winning 0 times and Stagno 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Matoula winning 0, and Stagno 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matoula has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.83 while Stagno has played against players with an average rank of 145.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matoula has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stagno has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matoula has converted 49.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stagno has converted 55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
332
Rank
305
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (143-110)
Career Total W/L
40% (46-68)
13% (2-14)
YTD W/L
33% (5-10)
$2,930
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martha Matoula | Beatrice Stagno |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) | 67% (41/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (29/41) | 44% (18/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (33/61) | 41% (28/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Martha Matoula
Player
Beatrice Stagno
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martha Matoula | Beatrice Stagno |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 13% (2/14) | 33% (5/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 26% (10/29) | 32% (11/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (145/213) | 40% (127/187) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 15% (2/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:57 | 1:20:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.75 | 111.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (687/1163) | 65% (511/785) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (371/687) | 53% (272/511) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (187/476) | 37% (101/274) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (64/129) | 55% (44/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (522/1154) | 44% (334/765) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 8% (1/12) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 31% (4/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 13% (2/16) | 36% (5/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 40% (5/2) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 60% (5/3) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Martha Matoula Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Martha Matoula
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Martha Matoula
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
74 of
128)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Martha Matoula
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Martina Genis Salas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
14
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
7 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
53%
(
37 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-1 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Alena Kasatkina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Martha Matoula
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Korokozidi
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Martha Matoula
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
12
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Beatrice Stagno Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Beatrice Stagno
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
11 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
27
Total Points Won
21
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Beatrice Stagno
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Beatrice Stagno
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Anna Kubareva
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
15
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Beatrice Stagno
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Beatrice Stagno
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Nala Kovacic
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
77%
(
75 of
97)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kseniya Yersh
Player
Beatrice Stagno
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Beatrice Stagno
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Tea Lukic
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matoula Vs Stagno Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
